COMMAND WORD · BIOLOGY

Evaluate

Review the evidence, include a strength and a weakness, and reach a judgement that follows from those points.

All command words

Writing frame

Strength S and weakness W, so judgement J in this context.

What the parts mean

  • Swhat supports the claim here
  • Wwhat limits the claim
  • Jhow far the claim actually goes

How to build your answer

  1. 1Use the evidence in the question, not a generic essay.
  2. 2Include one strength and one limit.
  3. 3State the judgement in one sentence.

Biology exemplar

Original question

Evaluate the claim “this fertiliser always increases yield”, using one illustrative field in one year, with a higher mean yield and no other sites.

no fertiliserfertilisedOne site. No other year. No test supplied.
The fertilised plot yielded more in this trial. Nothing else is shown.

Annotated answer

SThe higher mean is a strength for this field and this year. WOne site and one year cannot support the word always, and no statistical test is given. JThe claim is supported for this trial only.

The labels match the frame. Read them in order. This is one accurate route, not the only one.

Exam habit

The judgement has to use the points you have just made.

Common pitfall

Treating inhibition on an agar plate as if it established that an infection was cured.

Practice question

3 marks

Original practice

Mark points shown after marking

On one agar plate, the clear zone around a disc soaked in a new drug was 4 mm wider than the zone around a water control. A student concluded: “the drug cured the infection”. Evaluate this conclusion. (Illustrative result.)

(3)

Total for this question: 3 marks

Answer discussion

The wider zone supports greater inhibition than water on this plate. It does not show a cure, a safe dose or activity in a person. Inhibition on an agar plate does not establish that an infection was cured. The conclusion overreaches the evidence.

Sources

Pearson Biology specification · Sample assessment PDF