EXTENSION

Thinking Bigger: Decomposition and Forensics

See why a forensic result is a method plus a range, not a single dramatic fact.

YOUR SPECIFICATION

What you need to know

  • 6.16–6.20Enrichment on the limits of time-of-death signs and of a . Not extra case law to memorise.
Pearson specification · Issue 2, p. 32

No real cases, no invented match probabilities, no instruction to examine remains.

By the end, you should be able to…

  • List the 6.20 signs and the main limit of each.
  • Explain what a profile can add that a body temperature cannot.
  • Keep both results short of a courtroom verdict.
SPECIFICATION-ALIGNED LEARNING

Build your understanding

Five signs, five limits

Temperature depends on the scene. Rigor depends on and later decay, and on warmth. Decomposition extent and the of decomposers change with . Insects date , not always death. Writing all five without the limits looks thorough and is still weak.

A answers a different question: whether a sample could have come from a particular plant, animal or person, or whether two individuals could be parent and offspring. It does not take a temperature. It does not replace the biological clock. It can fail if the is degraded, mixed, or contaminated, which is why reference methods exist.

Do not collapse them into one sentence

“The maggots and the gel say it was this person at 6 pm” joins two different measurements and invents a precision neither has. Keep the sentences apart. Then say what extra evidence would be needed. That is the scientific habit, and it matches the idea that forensic science is a method applied to evidence.

EXAM TIPS & ADVICE

Make your reasoning visible

Range language

“Consistent with” and “at least” are stronger than a false exact time.

No probability you were not given

Do not write one-in-a-billion unless the question supplies it.

Avoid this misconception

The claim: More scientific words make an exact time of death.

The correction: Each sign has a stated limit. Combining them narrows a range. It does not create a minute, and a answers identity, not the clock.

RETRIEVE · APPLY · CHECK

Check your understanding

Try each question before opening the suggested answer.

  1. Practice question

    Retrieval and explanation · suggested answer

    Which 6.20 sign can still be used when the body is only bones and insects have long gone? What can it no longer tell you?

    Show suggested answer

    Little of the soft-tissue clock remains. Dry remains show that decay has gone a long way, but temperature, rigor and early insects are gone, so the time is a wide range.

  2. Practice question

    Retrieval and explanation · suggested answer

    What question does a DNA profile answer that body temperature does not?

    Show suggested answer

    Whether the DNA could have come from a particular individual, or whether two individuals could be related. Temperature says nothing about identity.

  3. Practice question

    Retrieval and explanation · suggested answer

    Why can identical twins not be separated by a standard profile?

    Show suggested answer

    They have the same DNA sequence, so the repeat lengths match.

STRETCH QUESTION

Take the idea further

Apply the same specification knowledge to an unfamiliar problem. Any extra assumptions are supplied in the question.

Stretch question

A news headline says “Science proved the time and the person”. The only results are a core temperature with no ambient reading, and a profile at two loci that also matches the investigator’s contaminated control. Rewrite the headline as two cautious sentences.

Show a hint

Split the clock from the identity, and keep the failed control.

Explore the reasoning

The temperature cannot time the death because the surroundings were not measured and one reading has no fixed rate. The profile cannot identify anyone because the same bands appeared in the negative control, so contamination is a better explanation than a match. Two loci would have been too few even in a clean run.

RECALL

Recall this lesson

Lesson recall questions

5 of 83 recall questions for 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 6.19, 6.200 of 5 rated0 secure

Question 1 of 5: List four components that must be in a PCR tube besides the template DNA.

016.17List

PCR amplification

Practice question

Retrieval and explanation · suggested answer

List four components that must be in a PCR tube besides the template DNA.

Try this from memory first.

Practise more of these specification points

Beyond the classroom

Put your biology to work

Explore where these ideas appear in the world. Enrichment, not extra required recall.

ResearchEnvironment

Difficult DNA is a methods problem

6C · Thinking BiggerNIST’s forensic science programme includes reference materials for analysing difficult DNA, such as degraded samples or mixtures. That is the enrichment: a band is not self-explanatory when the…Specification 6.19Read & use the scienceClose article

Why this matters

NIST’s forensic science programme includes reference materials for analysing difficult DNA, such as degraded samples or mixtures. That is the enrichment: a band is not self-explanatory when the sample is poor. The page does not teach rigor mortis. Do not import a case. A damaged or mixed sample may produce missing or additional peaks. A forensic scientist has to state how uncertainty affects the inference, rather than silently treating every mark as a genuine allele.

Back to the specification

Pearson Edexcel IAL Biology · Issue 2, February 2021 · Unit 4, pp. 29–32. The application extends beyond required recall.

  • 6.19 understand how DNA profiling is used for identification and determining genetic relationships between organisms (plants and animals)
Read the Pearson specification

Use the science

Why does a degraded sample make “the gel will be as clear as the textbook” unlikely?

Explore a possible response

Broken DNA may produce a partial pattern, and a mixture can add extra bands. NIST works on reference materials for those problems. A textbook lane is a clean illustration, not that sample.

Explore the source

CareersPop Culture

A DNA band is not a verdict

6C · DNA ProfilingNIST explains why a forensic DNA mixture is harder to interpret than a clean textbook gel. Several people may contribute DNA, a small amount can produce weak signals,…Specification 6.18 · 6.19Read & use the scienceClose article

Why this matters

NIST explains why a forensic DNA mixture is harder to interpret than a clean textbook gel. Several people may contribute DNA, a small amount can produce weak signals, and some alleles can drop out during testing. Electrophoresis still separates fragments by length; interpretation then compares several genetic markers and considers uncertainty. A crime-drama image of one matching band cannot identify a person by itself. The analyst must also ask whether the sample is relevant, whether contamination is possible and how strong the comparison is. A profile can support an inference about identity or relationship, not a direct conclusion about what action occurred.

Back to the specification

Pearson Edexcel IAL Biology · Issue 2, February 2021 · Unit 4, pp. 29–32. The application extends beyond required recall.

  • 6.18 know how gel electrophoresis can be used to separate DNA fragments of different length
  • 6.19 understand how DNA profiling is used for identification and determining genetic relationships between organisms (plants and animals)
Read the Pearson specification

Use the science

Why is one band of matching length much weaker evidence than a well-controlled multi-locus profile?

Explore a possible response

Many people can share one fragment length. Multiple independent markers and controls reduce coincidence and reveal mixture or contamination issues.

Explore the source

EnvironmentResearch

PCR finds a species without seeing it

6C · Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)US Geological Survey scientists develop species-specific PCR assays for environmental DNA in water. An organism can leave cells or fragments behind, so a sample may reveal its DNA…Specification 6.17Read & use the scienceClose article

Why this matters

US Geological Survey scientists develop species-specific PCR assays for environmental DNA in water. An organism can leave cells or fragments behind, so a sample may reveal its DNA even when the animal itself is not seen. Primers select the sequence to amplify, and controls help detect contamination or failed reactions. A positive signal means target DNA was detected under the assay conditions; it does not directly count living animals or prove they are at that exact spot now. This conservation application uses the same amplification principle as the lesson while adding the problem of interpreting tiny traces in a changing environment.

Back to the specification

Pearson Edexcel IAL Biology · Issue 2, February 2021 · Unit 4, pp. 29–32. The application extends beyond required recall.

  • 6.17 know how DNA can be amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Read the Pearson specification

Use the science

Why can a positive environmental-DNA PCR result not be converted directly into the number of fish in a lake?

Explore a possible response

DNA can persist, move and be shed at different rates; PCR detects a target sequence, not a one-to-one count of living fish.

Explore the source

Browse all Unit 4 connections →
END OF THE LESSON

What next?

Choose an activity, or move on to the next lesson.