EXTENSION

Thinking Bigger: Microbiology

Use TMV’s discovery as a method story for why viruses were separated from bacteria, without adding extra required virus names.

Student Book 2 · p. 114

YOUR SPECIFICATION

What you need to know

  • 6.5(i)Viruses as acellular particles with nucleic acid in a .
Pearson specification · Issue 2, p. 31

Historical method is enrichment. Required comparisons remain Ebola, TMV, HIV and λ phage.

By the end, you should be able to…

  • Explain why a filterable, cell-free agent required a new category.
  • Link ’s rod to the 6.5(i) headings.
  • Refuse extra plant-virus lists as automatic specification content.
SPECIFICATION-ALIGNED LEARNING

Build your understanding

Smaller than a filter that stops bacteria

Nineteenth-century tobacco disease could be transferred by sap that had passed through filters that retained bacteria. The agent was reproducing in the plant, yet it was not a cell on a plate. That method story is why “virus” had to mean something other than “tiny bacterium”.

APSNet’s pages describe a rod of plus protein, about 300 nm long in their teaching figure — a size for context, not a number you must recall. School 6.5 still wants RNA, helical , no .

A particle that needs a host

TMV does not grow on nutrient agar. It has no to run a lag-exponential curve of its own. Measuring “growth” of a virus means counting particles or infected hosts, not CFU of the virus as a free-living colony. That is why 6.2–6.4 are written for microorganisms in culture, with viruses compared as structures in 6.5.

Do not turn the history into extra named plant viruses. , and remain the other three specified comparisons.

Comparison figure including the TMV helical rod among the four specification viruses.
TMV is already on the 6A 1 comparison. This page is about why that particle is not a small bacterium. Open full-size figure
EXAM TIPS & ADVICE

Make your reasoning visible

Method, then category

Filterable and acellular, therefore not a bacterium — then apply nucleic acid, , .

Do not inflate the list

A research paper’s extra virus is not automatic 6.5 content.

Avoid this misconception

The claim: is a bacterium that lost its wall.

The correction: TMV is an virus with a helical capsid and no envelope. It never was a prokaryotic cell.

RETRIEVE · APPLY · CHECK

Check your understanding

Try each question before opening the suggested answer.

  1. Practice question

    Retrieval and explanation · suggested answer

    Why did a bacteria-stopping filter still allow TMV to transmit disease?

    Show suggested answer

    The agent is a virus particle smaller than a bacterium, so it could pass the filter and still infect the plant.

  2. Practice question

    Retrieval and explanation · suggested answer

    Which 6.5 headings still apply to TMV after this history?

    Show suggested answer

    RNA nucleic acid, helical capsid, no envelope; acellular, reproduces only in a host.

STRETCH QUESTION

Take the idea further

Apply the same specification knowledge to an unfamiliar problem. Any extra assumptions are supplied in the question.

Stretch question

A student wants to plot a four-phase growth curve for TMV in a flask of broth. What category error is that, and what would you measure instead if you were studying spread in plants?

Show a hint

No cytoplasm, no binary fission in broth.

Explore the reasoning

TMV is not a free-living cell, so lag–exponential–stationary–death in broth does not apply. You would need a host (plants or protoplasts) and a measure of particles or lesions, which is not Core Practical 13.

RECALL

Recall this lesson

Lesson recall questions

5 of 17 recall questions for 6.50 of 5 rated0 secure

Question 1 of 5: Compare the nucleic acid of a bacterium with that of a virus.

016.5Compare

Bacteria vs viruses

Practice question

Retrieval and explanation · suggested answer

Compare the nucleic acid of a bacterium with that of a virus.

Try this from memory first.

Practise more of these specification points

Beyond the classroom

Put your biology to work

Explore where these ideas appear in the world. Enrichment, not extra required recall.

ResearchMedicine

A teaching virus that earned its place

6A · Thinking BiggerAPSNet presents TMV as stable, well studied and useful for showing virus–host interaction. That is why it is the plant example in 6.5(i), not because tobacco farming is…Specification 6.5(i)Read & use the scienceClose article

Why this matters

APSNet presents TMV as stable, well studied and useful for showing virus–host interaction. That is why it is the plant example in 6.5(i), not because tobacco farming is on the specification. Treat their 300 nm rod as a published teaching size, not a recall fact. TMV was useful because its simple, robust particle could be purified and studied. A named virus still has a host and a genome type; historical fame does not replace those structural comparisons.

Back to the specification

Pearson Edexcel IAL Biology · Issue 2, February 2021 · Unit 4, pp. 29–32. The application extends beyond required recall.

  • 6.5(i) be able to compare the structure of bacteria and viruses (nucleic acid, capsid structure and envelope) with reference to Ebola virus, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and lambda phage (λ phage)
Read the Pearson specification

Use the science

Why is “TMV is 300 nm, therefore all viruses are 300 nm” wrong?

Explore a possible response

That length is one teaching measurement for TMV. Ebola, HIV and λ phage have different shapes and sizes; the required comparison is nucleic acid, capsid and envelope.

Explore the source

MedicineResearchPop Culture

The Ebola image is a structure, not a monster

6A · Bacteria and VirusesFilm posters often turn a virus into a spiky creature with a face. A CDC electron micrograph instead shows a filamentous Ebola particle with an outer envelope and…Specification 6.5(i)Read & use the scienceClose article

Why this matters

Film posters often turn a virus into a spiky creature with a face. A CDC electron micrograph instead shows a filamentous Ebola particle with an outer envelope and internal nucleocapsid. The shape may help a researcher recognise a family, but the image cannot reveal the RNA sequence or prove how that particular particle will behave in a host. Ebola is one of four specified viruses to compare by nucleic acid, capsid and envelope. A bacterium has a cellular structure with cytoplasm and ribosomes; the virus does not. A dramatic image is a starting observation, not a complete biological classification.

Back to the specification

Pearson Edexcel IAL Biology · Issue 2, February 2021 · Unit 4, pp. 29–32. The application extends beyond required recall.

  • 6.5(i) be able to compare the structure of bacteria and viruses (nucleic acid, capsid structure and envelope) with reference to Ebola virus, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and lambda phage (λ phage)
Read the Pearson specification

Use the science

What can the electron image support about Ebola, and what would require a different test?

Explore a possible response

It can support observations about particle shape and envelope projections. Genome type or sequence needs molecular analysis, not shape alone.

Explore the source

Browse all Unit 4 connections →
END OF THE LESSON

What next?

Choose an activity, or move on to the next lesson.