P6.11

Braking and impact forces

Indicative relationship: Edexcel International GCSE Physics · Forces and Motion
KS3 science lesson

Braking and impact forces

Lesson focus: combines reaction and braking phases, while restraint systems reduce injury by increasing the time over which changes.

Learning objective

Explain factors affecting thinking and and use force, energy and momentum ideas to evaluate safety features.

Build on earlier learning

Acceleration and SUVAT

The earlier lesson calculated constant-deceleration displacement. This lesson applies the model carefully to vehicle safety.

You will be successful when you can…

  • Separate thinking and braking distance.
  • Explain key influencing factors.
  • Apply speed-squared reasoning.
  • Explain impact-time safety features.
KEY VOCABULARY

Words that carry the science

thinking distance
Distance travelled during the driver’s reaction time before braking begins.
braking distance
Distance travelled after braking begins until the vehicle stops.
stopping distance
Thinking distance plus braking distance.
reaction time
Time between detecting a hazard and initiating a response.
momentum
Mass multiplied by velocity, measured in kg m s⁻¹.
crumple zone
A vehicle region designed to deform and lengthen collision time while absorbing energy.
BUILD YOUR UNDERSTANDING

Stopping has two distinct phases

01Stopping has two distinct phases

Stopping distance = thinking distance + braking distance. depends on speed and ; fatigue, distraction, alcohol and some drugs can increase reaction time.

depends on initial speed, mass, brake and tyre condition, road grip and gradient. Separate the phases when explaining a factor.

02Speed strongly affects braking

Kinetic energy is proportional to speed squared, so doubling speed gives four times the kinetic energy at the same mass. Brakes and road forces must transfer this extra energy.

Under an ideal constant braking force, v² = u² + 2as predicts braking distance proportional to u². Real braking also depends on grip, heating and control systems.

03Safety features change force and energy pathways

p = mv must change during a stop. For the same momentum change, increasing collision time reduces average force because F = change in momentum ÷ time.

Seat belts, airbags and lengthen stopping time or distribute force. Crumple zones also transfer kinetic energy into deformation and heating; they do not remove the need for restraints.

A road timeline separates thinking distance from braking distance. A second panel compares a short high-force stop with a longer lower-force stop for the same momentum change.thinking distancebraking distancehazard seenbrakes beginstoppedrigid, short stopshort timebelt + crumple zonelonger time → lower average force
Figure · Reaction controls thinking distance; speed, grip and braking control braking distance. Restraints reduce force by extending stopping time.
Interactive model

Stopping distance

Stopping distance = thinking distance + braking distance. Thinking distance is covered before the brakes go on; braking distance grows with the square of the speed.

thinking 9 mbraking 14 m0.0 s · 30 mphstopping distance 23 m

Controls

30 mph
0.67 s

Tiredness, alcohol, drugs and phones all make it longer.

Road
Thinking + braking9 m + 14 m = 23 m

With a 0.67 s reaction time on a dry road these match the Highway Code: 23 m at 30 mph, 96 m at 70 mph. Wet and icy braking distances are about 2 and 10 times longer.

Thinking distance rises in a straight line with speed; braking distance curves upwards, so the total rises faster and faster.20304050607002040608010012023 mThinking distanceStopping distanceSpeed / mphDistance / m
WORKED EXAMPLE

Combine stopping components

A driver reacts in 0.80 s at 20 m s⁻¹, then brakes for 40 m.

  1. Thinking distance = speed × reaction time.
  2. Thinking distance = 20 × 0.80 = 16 m.
  3. Stopping distance = thinking + braking.
  4. Stopping distance = 16 + 40 = 56 m.

How to make the reasoning visible: A faster speed increases distance during the same reaction time and usually increases braking distance more strongly.

LEARN BY DOING

Analyse road-safety evidence

Compare model stopping components under different conditions.

ConditionSpeed / m s⁻¹Thinking / mBraking / m
alert, dry road1510.518
tired, dry road151818
alert, wet road1510.531
alert, dry road302172
  1. Which condition changes thinking but not braking distance?

  2. How does doubling speed affect the model braking distance?

RETRIEVE · APPLY · CHECK

Check your understanding

Answer from memory, then check against the suggested answer.

State the stopping-distance relationship.

Name two factors increasing reaction time.

How does increasing collision time affect average force?

Apply the idea

Why can worn tyres increase braking distance without changing thinking distance?

Stretch and challenge

Why does an airbag not make momentum change smaller if the passenger still comes to rest?

Exam Question Practice

P6.11Explain6 marks

Exam Question Practice

Mark points shown after marking

Driving faster increases stopping distance. Seat belts reduce injury in a collision.

(a)

Explain why driving faster increases stopping distance.

(3)
(b)

Explain how a seat belt reduces injury.

(3)

Total for this question: 6 marks

Command word: For , separate the pre-braking, braking and collision-force arguments.

Tick when you have worked through it. It shows on My progress and is saved on this device only.