B2.5

Effects on wildlife

Indicative relationship: Activate 1 · contextual consolidation
KS3 science lesson

Effects on wildlife

Lesson focus: How can a discarded object affect an animal far from where it was used?

Learning objective

Explain pathways from waste to harm in ecosystems.

Build on earlier learning

MRS GREN

Connect disruption of movement and nutrition to life processes.

You will be successful when you can…

  • Describe transport into habitats.
  • Explain entanglement and ingestion pathways.
  • Distinguish exposure from effect.
  • Identify confounding variables.
KEY VOCABULARY

Words that carry the science

entanglement
Becoming trapped or restricted by material such as line or netting.
ingestion
Taking material into the digestive system.
microplastic
A plastic particle smaller than 5 mm.
exposure
Contact with a substance or hazard.
confounding variable
Another factor that differs and could affect the measured outcome.
BUILD YOUR UNDERSTANDING

Build causal explanations while respecting the evidence

01Waste moves through connected systems

Wind, drains and rivers can carry litter from where it was used into terrestrial, freshwater or marine habitats. Larger items can fragment into smaller pieces without fully breaking down chemically.

02Name the mechanism of harm

can restrict swimming, flight, feeding or escape. In simple steps: plastic wraps around the animal and traps it. The animal cannot move properly, so it may not be able to find food or escape from predators. This makes it less likely to survive. can block the gut, create false fullness or expose tissue to associated chemicals, depending on material and dose.

03Test causal claims carefully

Finding plastic in an animal demonstrates . Stronger evidence about harm measures outcomes, compares suitable groups and considers food, temperature, disease and habitat differences.

Two causal pathways show entanglement restricting movement and ingestion reducing feeding. Evidence labels distinguish observations of exposure from evidence needed to establish health effects and rule out alternatives.fishing lineentanglementrestricted movementless feeding / escapeplastic fragmentsingestiongut blockage /false fullnessreduced conditionobserving plastic shows exposure; controlled comparisons strengthen claims about effects
Figure · A plausible pathway is not automatically proof of causation. Measure exposure and outcome, compare suitable groups and consider other differences such as food, temperature, disease and habitat quality.
WORKED EXAMPLE

Evaluate a field comparison

Fish at site A contain more and grow more slowly than fish at site B.

  1. Identify the association: exposure is higher where growth is lower.
  2. Do not convert association directly into causation.
  3. Check alternatives such as temperature, food, oxygen, age and disease.
  4. Seek repeated sites, matched groups and dose–response evidence, or an experiment with a control group.

How to make the reasoning visible: The observation supports a hypothesis but does not isolate plastic as the cause.

LEARN BY DOING

Pathway and evidence map

For each claim, identify evidence for the link and an alternative explanation.

ClaimSupporting observationAlternativeStronger evidence
Line restricts sealLine wrapped around bodyPre-existing injuryMovement before/after safe removal
Ingestion reduces feedingPlastic in gut + low stomach contentsSeasonal food shortageMatched exposed/unexposed groups
Site A slows growthLower growth at polluted siteLower temperatureRepeated matched sites
Fragments persistSmaller pieces over timePieces transported awayMass/particle tracking
  1. Why does plastic in a gut show exposure but not automatically harm?

  2. Why compare more than one polluted and clean site?

  3. Use the table. A seal has fishing line wrapped around its body. Why is this not enough on its own to prove the line injured it?

RETRIEVE · APPLY · CHECK

Check your understanding

Answer from memory, then check against the suggested answer.

What is entanglement?

What is ingestion?

What does exposure mean?

Name two ways plastic can harm wildlife.

What are microplastics?

Apply the idea

Explain one route from a dropped wrapper to reduced feeding in a seabird.

Stretch and challenge

Design a safer observational comparison of fish growth across sites.

Why might large plastic pieces turn into microplastics over time?

Exam Question Practice

B2.5Explain4 marks

Exam Question Practice

Mark points shown after marking

Animals such as turtles and seabirds can get tangled in plastic. Answer the parts to explain how this can stop them surviving.

(a)

What does the plastic do to the animal?

(1)
(b)

What can the animal not do properly?

(1)
(c)

Give one thing the animal needs to move for.

(1)
(d)

So what happens to its chance of survival?

(1)

Total for this question: 4 marks

Command word: Build a chain of steps from the plastic to the animal’s survival.

Tick when you have worked through it. It shows on My progress and is saved on this device only.